No Images? Click here ![]() ISS completes its annual round of EMEA updates to guidelinesInstitutional Shareholder Services (‘ISS’) has now published its 2020 benchmark proxy voting policies which will apply for annual general meetings from February 1st 2020. The guidelines cover EMEA, including the UK and Ireland and we have focused below on the changes relating to remuneration in the UK market. The guidelines have been released slightly earlier than in recent years, probably so that companies can consider them as part of any 2020 policy renewals. Many of our clients have been developing their directors’ remuneration policies for shareholder renewal next year knowing these could be affected by the updated ISS guidance. The revised guidelines further develop ISS' position in relation to the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, though companies may be relieved to see that the updates to the guidelines make less changes and are less prescriptive than some of the equivalent guidance from other bodies. It is unsurprising to see an update to the guidance on pension provision but there is no change to last year’s position on post-cessation share ownership guidelines nor to their position on the use of restricted shares. Pension:ISS' position is that the pension arrangements for new joiners should be aligned with those of the wider workforce, and companies should actively disclose whether or not this is the case. For incumbent directors, companies should seek to align the contribution rates with the workforce over time, recognising that many investors in the UK will expect this to be achieved in the near term. Consistent with other guidelines, for new appointments to the Board, ISS expects that the pension contribution should be aligned to that of the workforce. ISS has noted The Investment Association’s (IA) stance on pension, including their expectation for a ‘credible plan’ to pay the same pension contributions as the majority of the workforce by the end of 2022, and the focus on pension contribution rates at or above 25% of base salary. However, ISS says that existing pension arrangements for incumbent executives will be “assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account any explanations provided by the relevant company” and that, while it will not be issuing a vote against recommendation on a remuneration policy in 2020 due to an existing pension arrangement for an incumbent director unless it is ‘exceptionally generous’, it encourages companies to be aware of investor sentiment and set out a clear plan to reduce over time. ISS (and Glass Lewis) are, therefore, less dogmatic than some, but encouraging of the 'direction of travel'. Disclosure of annual bonus targets ISS will normally recommend a vote against a remuneration report where bonus targets are not disclosed. Targets for both financial and non-financial objectives should be presented in an appropriate level of detail, preferably with a full target range (e.g. threshold, target and maximum) set out. Any company choosing to disclose one or more years in arrears would be out of step with wider market practice and may attract a negative vote recommendation. ISS has strengthened its expectations surrounding bonus disclosure and has brought it more in line with the IA’s guidance. As the majority of companies do provide immediate disclosure of targets following the year-end without facing any issues around commercial sensitivity, ISS says that any companies that do not will be viewed sceptically. The remuneration committee should disclose how it has taken into account any relevant environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters when determining remuneration outcomes. Such factors may include (but are not limited to): workplace fatalities and injuries, significant environmental incidents, large or serial fines or sanctions from regulatory bodies and/or significant adverse legal judgments or settlements. Under the discretion section of the guidance, ISS has expanded its view on environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks within the remuneration framework. There is now an expectation that ESG risks or controversies should be reflected in the remuneration outcome and, if not, that sufficient explanation is provided. Departing Executive Directors In general, formal notice should be served no later than the day on which the departing executive's leaving date is announced. If a company chooses not to serve notice at this time, it should explain its reasoning for this in the subsequent remuneration report. ISS is seeking to clamp down on situations where a departure is announced but the payment in-lieu-of-notice commences from a later date, thereby effectively extending the notice period and the period any incentive pro-rating is operated over. ISS has also clarified as part of its guidance that, if a director moves from an executive to a non-executive role, any time pro-rating should be limited to the end of the holding of the executive position. This is in line with its recent voting advice where we have seen examples of vote against recommendations being issued where pro-rating was extended to the period served as a non-executive. ISS and Mainland Europe As EU members implement SRD II, many of the more stringent voting policies (e.g. on use of discretion) which have applied only to UK/ Ireland will now cover mainland European listed companies. Amendments also focus on excessive practices, including severance terms. If you wish to discuss anything arising from this briefing, please ask your usual contact at FIT or call us on 020 7034 1111 or email us at Info@fit-rem.com. Rory Cray Darrell Hare Matt Higgins John Lee Sahul Patel Iain Scott Katharine Turner This paper is intended to be a summary of key issues but is not comprehensive and does not constitute advice. No legal responsibility is accepted as a result of reliance on the contents of this paper. This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the email and do not use it in any way. FIT Remuneration Consultants LLP (FIT) does not accept or assume responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email by anyone, other than the intended addressee to the extent agreed in the relevant contract for the matter to which this email relates (if any). Consistent with data protection regulations, if you would like to review our records relating to your contact details or to request their removal from our systems, please contact us at info@fit-rem.com. While all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by FIT in this regard. FIT is a limited liability partnership registered in England under registered number OC364396, with its registered address at 5 Fitzhardinge St, London W1H 6ED. |